The result of
observation that conducted on the students X Class in the subject strategy
market train of SMK PGRI 6 Malang become of the background of this research.
Based on the result of the observation, there was 20 students of X market class
only 20% students active in the proses of teaching and learning. The teacher of
subject strategy market train also teach on SMK NEGERI 1 MALANG make the
teacher didn’t came in the class. This condition make many of the students
often absent and didn’t active in class. The purpose of this research to
increasing motivation and students learning outcomes which used learning model
Team Assisted Individualization which more enhanced students learning in group
and teaching each other about the material didn’t understand in the group of
heterogenic. The teacher just as the facilitator that facilitate group.
This research use
qualitative approach with the type of Class Action Research (CAR). This
research was conducted in II Cycle, every cycle consist of II meeting and VI
steps, that are; planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The
location of this research on SMK PGRI 6 Malang at Jalan Janti Selatan No. 1
Bandungrejo, Sukun, Malang. The subject was student X market class of SMK PGRI
6 Malang consists of 20 students, even semester academic year of 2015/216. The
instrument of this research use teacher observation students in the
implementation of TAI model, motivation questionnaire, pre-test and post-test,
documentation. Analysis data technique use data reduction from the data teacher
and student observation, the presentation of data from data reduction and
taking conclusion. Analysis of learning outcomes taken from pre-test and
post-test with the purpose to determine student classical absorption. While to
measure student motivation by using questionnaire, it can be known success if
the result has reached indicator of success with the score of motivation more
than 3, 5.
The result of research
shown that; (1) Implementation Team Assisted Individualization model can
increasing student motivation. Can be proven from the result of calculating of
questionnaire that filled by students in every end of cycle. The result about
3, 68 with the category good in the cycle I. Increasing become 3, 83 in the
cycle II with the category good. (2) Learning outcomes aspect before
implementing Team Assisted Individualization average result value 23, 37 with
the classical completeness 0%. After implementing become 74, 42 with the
classical completeness about 63, 157% in the cycle I. Pre-test in cycle II
shown that average result score of class about 67, 77. After implementing the
result of post-test in cycle II shown that an increase average result score
about 80 with the classical completeness 82, 215%.
Based on the result of
this research, researcher suggestion, (1) For teacher, learning model of Team
Assisted Individualization can be used as the alternative of learning model.
Giving reward engagement and explanation about learning model to make student
interesting in the process of teaching and learning. (2) For students, more
seriously in the process of teaching and learning, didn’t leave while teaching
and learning process, having book reference, and when entering the class
already have background of knowledge. (3) For other researchers, more creative
and innovative, understanding the steps in implementing Team Assisted
Individualization model in the right way, and giving handout to the students before
implementing Team Assisted Individualization model.
No comments:
Post a Comment